Best CSS Frameworks of 2017 : Responsive and Popular

, , Leave a comment

 

Table of Contents

Best CSS Frameworks of 2017 : Responsive and Popular –

Below are the some Best Responsive CSS frameworks of 2017 :
css frameworks

Twitter Bootstrap

twitter bootstrap -Responsive CSS Frameworks
Bootstrap is by far most famous and the best front end cascading style sheet available right now.
GITHUB Stars : 106,557 
GITHUB Link : https://github.com/twbs/bootstrap

Why should you employ bootstrap in your project?

  1. Free to use.
  2. Easy UI to indulge with.
  3. Capabilities : Bootstrap involves numerous templates that can be employed in typing, creating tables, modifying tabular entries, provide navigation and also aid you with javascript plugins.
  4. With the various number of platforms Introduced, bootstrap provides an amazing responsiveness to almost all the platforms out there with the help of pre-created classes.

What are the Pros of using Bootstrap?

  1. Anybody with just basic knowledge of CSS can use it .
  2. Versatile responsiveness.
  3. Core framework What are the Consists of mobile-styling.
  4. What are the Consistent-Efficient throughout the deployment process.
  5. User can make changes in the framework accordingly to their requirements.
  6. Large support community.

What are the Cons of using Bootstrap?

  1. Customizing bootstrap structure requires lots of rewriting the files.
  2. It could be a bulky to use at times.

Semantic -UI

semantic css
Semantic-ui is a development framework that helps in creating beautiful, responsive layouts that are easy to work with.
Github Stars : 31,276
GITHUB Link : https://github.com/Semantic-Org/Semantic-UI

Why should you employ Semantic-ui in your project?

  1. Semantic-UI is Free to use.
  2. It is responsive and allows manipulating and working on various tables, styling buttons.

What are the Pros of using Semantic-UI?

  1. It treats words and classes as exchangeable concepts.
  2. Employs use of regular English while describing relationships, entities.
  3. Offers a wide variety of over 3k themes.
  4. Debugging tends to be easier in semantics-ui.

What are the Cons of using Semantic-UI?

  1. Deployment process is bit greater.
  2. Lacks support for Internet Explorer.
  3. Semantic package is very large.

FOUNDATION

foundation css
FOUNDATION is a front end css framework maintained by zurb. It is a mobile first responsive framework with rapid development phase.
GITHUB Stars : 24,992
GITHUB Link : https://github.com/foundation/foundation-sites

Why should you employ Foundation in your project?

  1. Free and Open Source
  2. It is a mobile first responsive framework
  3. Foundation comes with a grid layout which is responsive with various types of devices like mobile phones, portrait and landscape format.

What are the Pros of using Foundation?

  1. Foundation has a great set of style sheets that provide basic style definitions for all key HTML components.
  2. In addition to basic definitions  it provides buttons with advanced features including grouping of buttons or buttons with drop-down option, pull up.
  3. It allows web pages to adjust dynamically.

What are the Cons of using Foundation?

  1. Foundation doesn’t support Internet explorer 8 because of some of the grid properties it uses.
  2. Customizations tend to be a bit of laggy process.

MATERIALIZE

materialize css
Materialize is a modern-front end framework based on the design of materials.
GITHUB Stars : 24,513
GITHUB Link : https://github.com/Dogfalo/materialize

Why should you employ Materialize in your project?

  1. Free to use.
  2. Responsive
  3. It implements Google’s material design specifications which is loaded with ready-to-use buttons, iWhat are the Cons, cards, forms and other components.

What are the Pros of using Materialize?

  1. Materialize includes a IZ column grid feature which can be used for website layouts.
  2. It allows large number of components to be selected.
  3. Pre-created great templates to use.
  4. Pretty good to use in small projects.

What are the Cons of using Materialize?

  1. The deployment process with large file/project becomes laggy.
  2. Does’t offer support for Flexbox model.

MATERIAL-UI

material ui css
Material-UI is the easiest  to adhere to Google’s material design guidelines.
GITHUB Stars :23,034
GITHUB Link : https://github.com/callemall/material-ui

Why should you employ Material-ui in your project?

  1. Free to use. 
  2. Material-UI is a manually made responsive framework.

What are the Pros of using Materialize-ui?

  1. Easy to customize
  2. Many pre-loaded material design-compliant components.
  3. Best to adhere to Google’s material design guidelines.

What are the Cons of using Materialize-ui?

  1. Doesn’t offer advantage to strart a project from beginning.
  2. One needs a prior knowledge of React.

 PURE

pure css
Pure offers small but responsive modules to inherent in any project.
GITHUB Stars :15,938
GITHUB Link : https://github.com/pure-css/pure

Why should you employ Pure in your project?

  1. Free to use.
  2. Pure offers a great responsive framework including buttons, menus, grids, tables and other features.

What are the Pros of using Pure?

  1. Smallest css pack ever What are the Consuming only 3.8KB.
  2. Allows fluid yet faster loading on mobile platform.
  3. Offers great flexibility over coherent modules and module sets.

What are the Cons of using Pure?

  1. Pure offers only css and lacks support for jss and jquery.

SKELETON

skeleton css
Skeleton is a dead simple cc framework with pretty much everything needed.
GITHUB Stars :13,500
GITHUB Link : https://github.com/dhg/Skeleton

Why should you employ Skeleton in your project?

  1. Free to use.
  2. Skeleton is a responsive framework flexible with many devices.

What are the Pros of using Skeleton?

  1. Skeleton requires zero installation time and setup requirements .
  2. Allows you to compile projects straightaway.
  3. Pretty good to use in small projects.
  4. Clean designs.

What are the Cons of using Skeleton?

  1. The time spent in development is a great complexity.
  2. It offers only a single demo at a time.

BULMA
bulma css

Bulma is the best ever modern framework based on Flexbox.
GITHUB Stars :12,257
GITHUB Link : https://github.com/jgthms/bulma

Why should you employ Bulma in your project?

  1. Open Source and free to use.
  2. Skeleton is a flexible responsive framework with many devices and built for mobile-first.

What are the Pros of using Bulma? 

  1. Very easy ui with the sizing of columns being done automatically.
  2. Easy support for drag and drop.
  3. Provides a flexible navigation bar.
  4. It allows to compose your elements with modifier classes.

What are the Cons of using Bulma?

  1. No official documentation regarding support for internet explorer.

UIKIT

uikit css
UIKIT is another modern yet fast productive framework designing web interfaces.
GITHUB Stars :8,452
GITHUB Link : https://github.com/uikit/uikit

Why should you employ UIKIT in your project?

  1. Free to use.
  2. UIKIT is a responsive framework and allows adding navigation bars, buttons, dialog boxes.

What are the Pros of using UIKIT?

  1. Best advantage of Uikit is that includes both LESS and Sass CSS preprocessors-a unique feature.
  2. Offers a completely responsive grid to work with.
  3. There are numerous styling components available.
  4. Versatile for multi platform development.
  5. Easy to customize

What are the Cons of using UIKIT?

  1. Being a newer framework lacks large and precise community support.
  2. Although modern, but there is a limit on the number of available resources.

MILLIGRAM

milligram css
Milligram provides a minimal setup of styles for a fast and clean starting point.
GITHUB Stars : 5,223
GITHUB Link : https://github.com/milligram/milligram

Why should you employ Milligram in your project?

  1. Open Source and free to use.
  2. Milligram is a responsive framework based on FlexBox.

What are the Pros of using Milligram?

  1. Extremely lightweight and tiny in size just about 2KB in gzip format.
  2. Highly productive and provides a better performance.
  3. Ui is simple and very convenient and easy to use.

What are the Cons of using Milligram?

  1. Only useful while creating small projects with least variation in styling.

 

 

Leave a Reply